| |
![]() |
||||||||
| PikeNet
Dispatch, August 6, 2002 Vol 7 No. 61 (593), "More than 9,000 subscribers" |
|||||||||
| Subscriber: |
||
| Previous Dispatch / Next Dispatch | ||
| What's a Fair Commission Split? | ||
|
Perennial Unanswered Questions... Recent Dispatches on service provider business models -- Colliers Turley Martin Tucker (Jul 9), Marcus & Millichap (Jul 18), CB Richard Ellis (Jul 30) and Sperry Van Ness (Aug 1) -- generated dozens of comments. So it's fun for me to reflect back over the past thirty years (man, that went fast) as a broker and (now) commentator. Just turn the clock back to 1970, 1980 or 1990. You'll hear the same issues hashed and rehashed. What's a fair allocation of a firm's revenue between brokers, managers and owners? How can you build incentives to promote internal and external cooperation? How do you align the interests of brokers and clients? Bottom line: There's no one right model. One size does not fit all. Widely differing individuals and firms successfully deliver a huge variety of services. Here are a few interesting comments. Craig Rowe at MetaPartners, Cary, NC: "The only thing holding back the collective move to a more consultative approach within commercial real estate is the fee structure. If a company's management (and it HAS to come from management) is insightful and inventive enough to adapt a team-sharing mentality, then a company will have a longer shelf life and in turn, increased broker loyalty." Steve
Collins at the Commercial Development Company in St. Louis, MO: "Perhaps
we will see more tailored marketing programs (or groups of brokers)
serving niche markets resulting in a dissolution of the "all-things-to-all-clients" model
of traditional brokerage firms." --Peter Pike |
||
| Peter Pike / PikeNet | Copyright © PikeNet
1996-2005 All Rights Reserved |
|