| |
![]() |
||||||||
| PikeNet
Dispatch, October 18, 2005 Vol 10 No. 79 (891), "More than 9,000 subscribers" |
|||||||||
| Subscriber: |
|
||||||||
| Previous Dispatch / Next Dispatch | |||||||||
Disclose, Disclose, Disclose... Wow, last week's Dispatch, Does Your Client Know Your Commission? (Oct 13), got my inbox jumping. Larry Ilfeld with Sperry Van Ness in Albuquerque, NM, likes his typical tenant representation language: "Client acknowledges understanding the fact that Broker may attempt to negotiate with any property owner or landlord a brokerage fee equal to (but not greater than) the Broker’s standard fee charged when representing landlords or sellers.” Norm Marquardson with Coldwell Banker Commercial NRT in Salt Lake City, UT, adds an interesting twist. "In a tenant-rep agreement we also include a commitment from the tenant to take reasonable steps to help us collect our fee from the landlord or landlord-broker, or pay it themselves. In that case, disclosure is even more important." Geoffrey Kasselman with Op2mize in Chicago wants to avoid an awkward conversation with his client. "It seems to me that failing to disclose the math could be more uncomfortable to a practitioner working with a sophisticated, creditworthy customer (is there a good reason to work with any other type?) than the conversation that ensues when the client figures it out later, especially when the resulting deal fee could equate to more than the client's annual salary." -- Peter Pike |
|||||||||
| Peter Pike / PikeNet | Copyright © PikeNet
1996-2005 All Rights Reserved |
|