| |
![]() |
||||||||
| PikeNet
Dispatch, June 1, 2006 Vol 11 No. 40 (942), "More than 9,000 subscribers" |
|||||||||
| Subscriber: |
|
|||||||||
| Previous Dispatch / Next Dispatch | ||||||||||
Risk and Reward... Last week's Dispatch, Real Estate CEO Compensation: Is It Fair? (May 23) generated some thoughtful comments. One senior real estate executive of a national real estate services company (who requested anonymity) wrote, "It is kind of 'old school' to think that the brokers in a firm should make significantly and consistently more than the top executives. If the model is a small or regional firm, with a few top producers and an owner of the equity, then certainly that makes sense... "But in a global world with all the responsibility (and liability) of public ownership, it seems a little naive to characterize the top guys at CBRE, Trammell, or JLL as 'just managers' with the presumptions that go with that. In fact, these guys should be judged on some level by the operating profits (or EBITDA) that their firms produce, or the expenses that they manage."
Here's what we know publicly. Go to Yahoo Finance. Enter a stock symbol, like CBG (or JLL or TCC), which displays a current snapshot of the company. In the left-hand column, click Profile. Toward the bottom of this page, you'll see the compensation paid to top executives. Now click Insider Transactions (also in left-hand column). For example, you'll see that three CBRE directors (Freeman-related entities, Malek and Wirta) have sold $211 million, $36 million and $7.9 million of CBRE stock, respectively. But these numbers pale in comparison to the sales by Blum Capital Partners, L.P., which took CBRE private before its second public offering in 2004. Blum-related entities have sold $1.1 billion of CBRE stock in the last two years. Now we're talking real money! -- Peter Pike |
||||||||||
| Peter Pike / PikeNet | Copyright © PikeNet
1996-2006 All Rights Reserved |
|